Skip to content

  • Home
  • COVID-19 Guide
  • COVID-19 AV library
  • Client results
  • Expertise
  • News & Insights
  • People
  • Our DNA
  • Inclusion and Diversity
  • Join us
  • Contact Us
Home / NEWS & INSIGHTS / Blog / Corporate Crime Hub / High Court says: you pay the fine for your ‘white-collar crime’
Corporate Crime Hub 20 March 2018

High Court says: you pay the fine for your ‘white-collar crime’

WHO SHOULD READ THIS
  • Senior Executives and Corporate Officers.
THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • The High Court has upheld a Judge’s order that a Union cannot pick up the bill for an individual’s penalty arising from a statutory breach.
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO
  • Understand that as an individual you may be liable to personally pay penalties for breaches of regulatory legislation in Australia.

The High Court has recently ordered that penalties for breaches of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) must be paid personally by individuals, upholding a Federal Court Judge’s order that the Union must not pay the penalty on the individual’s behalf.

In this article, we consider whether or not such an order could be made against a senior executive or corporate officer under similar Australian regulatory laws, such as mining and resources licencing, environmental protection, work health and safety, the corporations law, and other regulatory offences or ‘white-collar crime’. This move could effectively prevent an employer or insurer from picking up the tab for a regulatory fine or penalty sought by one of Australia’s many corporate regulators.

Background

A majority of the High Court has held that where the Federal Court orders an individual to pay a pecuniary penalty under the FW Act, it may also order that the penalty be paid personally by the individual without indemnification from their employer or union.

The case arose after an official from the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) organised and participated in the obstruction of the entrance to a building site. The blockade, which resulted in the cancellation of work, was done in support of a demand by the CFMEU that a CFMEU delegate be appointed on the site.

The Australian Building and Construction Commissioner brought proceedings against the CFMEU and the official for contraventions of section 348 of the FW Act, which prohibits the coercion of a person to engage in industrial activity.

First Instance Decision

The Federal Court imposed pecuniary penalties on both the CFMEU and the official. In considering the penalty to be imposed, Justice Mortimer considered the history of contraventions by the CFMEU and the official. Having regard to their prior conduct and the principal of general and specific deterrence, her Honour ordered the CFMEU to pay a pecuniary penalty of $60,000 and the official to pay a pecuniary penalty of $18,000, in addition to ordering that the CFMEU not directly or indirectly indemnify their official for the penalty. Her Honour said the non-indemnification order was appropriate because it would advance the purposes of deterrence by depriving the official of the ‘comfort and convenience’ of union money.

High Court Decision

In handing down its decision, the High Court examined the principal purpose of such penalties, including the issues of specific deterrence towards the contravener and a general deterrence towards other potential contraveners. On this basis, the Court held that the FW Act contained an implied power to ensure a contravener received the full ‘sting or burden’ of a penalty.

Potential Impact for Senior Staff

This decision affirms that courts can impose orders on some individuals to pay fines personally, rather than have an employer pay the penalty on their behalf. In upholding the Federal Court’s order, the High Court has re-emphasised that issues of general and specific deterrence are just as important, if not more important, in the context of breaches of regulatory laws by individuals, rather than the corporate entity.

Whilst this case is likely the ‘high-water mark’ in terms of offending, the High Court’s decision, along with a general increase in regulatory penalties and enforcement in all Australian jurisdictions, could potentially see Prosecutors and Regulators consider the appropriateness of non-indemnification orders in a range of ‘white-collar’ contexts.

 

 

This publication covers legal and technical issues in a general way. It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases. It is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

About the authors

  • Guy Humble

    Partner
  • Cameron Dean

    Partner
  • Scarlet Reid

    Partner
  • Tom Reaburn

    Senior Associate

In other news

Queensland’s new project trust regime to commence on 1 March 2021

15 February 2021BIF Act Amendment Series, Insight

McCullough Robertson strengthens its National Construction and Infrastructure team with key Partner hire in Brisbane

27 January 2021News

New Industrial Relations Laws – What it means for you

22 December 2020Insight

Payment Times Reporting Scheme

21 December 2020Insight

VIEW ALL NEWS & INSIGHTS

BRISBANE

Level 11, 66 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 1855
Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel +61 7 3233 8888
Fax +61 7 3229 9949

 

GET IN TOUCH

    Contact form

    We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

    sydney

    Level 32, MLC Centre
    19 Martin Place
    Sydney NSW 2000
    GPO Box 462
    Sydney NSW 2001

    Tel +61 2 8241 5600
    Fax +61 2 8241 5699

     

    GET IN TOUCH

      Contact form


      We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

      melbourne

      Level 27, 101 Collins Street
      Melbourne VIC 3000
      GPO Box 2924
      Melbourne VIC 3001

      Tel +61 3 9067 3100
      Fax +61 3 9067 3199

       

      GET IN TOUCH

        Contact form

        We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

        follow us

        CLIENT LOGIN

        newcastle

        Level 2, 16 Telford Street
        Newcastle NSW 2300
        PO Box 394
        Newcastle NSW 2300

        Tel +61 2 4914 6900
        Fax +61 2 4914 6999

         

        GET IN TOUCH

          Contact form


          We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

          canberra

          Level 9, 2 Phillip Law Street
          Canberra ACT 2601

          Tel +61 2 6243 3699
          Fax +61 2 8241 5699

           

          GET IN TOUCH

            Contact form


            We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

            © 2017 McCullough Robertson. Site map Disclaimer Privacy Policy Credit Reporting Policy

            X